Book 8 of 8

Book 8 — Education for Leisure

The best city needs citizens shaped for the good life, not just for war. Book 8 is Aristotle's argument for why education must be public, and why music — of all things — is its highest form.

Summary

Book 8 opens with the claim that education must be public. Citizens belong to the state, not merely to their parents; the care of each part of the city is inseparable from the care of the whole. The Spartans are praised for making education a state matter, though their content — focused entirely on the military virtues — is wrong. Education must not be exclusively directed to any single end, and certainly not to war, which is a means rather than an end. The end is peace, and the proper use of peace is leisure; education must therefore form citizens capable of using leisure well.

Aristotle works through the four conventional subjects. Reading and writing are necessary and useful, drawing is valuable for judging the beauty of the human form, and gymnastics contributes to health and courage — but none of these is the highest educational subject. That role belongs to music. Music is uniquely suited to education because it directly imitates and induces the emotions: rhythm and melody carry likenesses of anger, courage, temperance, and their opposites, and habituation in listening to them shapes character. This is why music should not be studied merely as entertainment or as a performing art but as a formative discipline.

The final sections of Book 8 work through the musical modes — Dorian for courage, Phrygian for enthusiasm, Mixolydian for sadness — and debate which are appropriate for education as opposed to performance and catharsis. Aristotle argues for a restricted curriculum: the Dorian mode for character formation, with other modes available for the trained adult listener but not for children. The text breaks off before the argument is complete. Whether this is because the work was unfinished, or because the remaining books have been lost, is uncertain. Politics ends not with a conclusion but in the middle of a sentence — which is, in its way, exactly right for a work that claims political science can never finish, only continue.

Read Chapter 8 in the reader →