Notes from Underground a guided tour

A forty-year-old retired clerk, alone in a Petersburg flat, talks to a reader he hates. The talk is the book.

The book in brief

Notes from Underground is the short novel where Dostoevsky's late voice arrives. He published it in 1864 in his magazine Epoch, the year after his first wife and his older brother both died. He was forty-three, broke, epileptic, and had not yet written any of the long novels he is now famous for. The book that came out of that bad year is the one everything afterwards is in conversation with.

It is told in two parts by an unnamed narrator known only as the Underground Man — a forty-year-old retired civil servant living alone on a small inheritance in a wretched Petersburg flat he calls a hole. Part 1, "Underground," is a hundred-page monologue addressed to a reader the narrator both needs and despises: a polemic against the rationalist utopians of his decade (Chernyshevsky's What Is to Be Done? by name), a defence of the human right to act against one's own interest, and a self-portrait of a mind too conscious to act and too proud to belong. Part 2, "Apropos of the Wet Snow," is a memoir of three episodes from his twenties — a two-year revenge fantasy against an officer who never noticed him, a dinner with school acquaintances that ends in humiliation, and an encounter in a brothel with a young woman named Liza that he ruins on purpose the moment she trusts him. The book is short. It does not let up.

Notes from Underground, chapter by chapter

Click through the 21 chapters like a tour. Each card picks up where the last left off — a quick way to read Notes from Underground in five minutes. Open any book in depth, or jump straight into the reader.

Part , Ch. 11 of 21
Part 1, Ch. 1

I am a sick man

The novel opens with the voice that runs through Part 1 — a forty-year-old retired civil servant addressing the reader directly from a basement flat in Petersburg. He is sick, he says. He is spiteful. He is unattractive. He refuses to see a doctor about his liver, he claims, out of spite. He used to work for the government; he has retired on a small inheritance; he is forty; he has been like this for twenty years. He admits, as soon as he has finished saying he was a spiteful clerk, that he was lying about that too. The chapter is short. The voice is the chapter.

Part 1, Ch. 2

Consciousness as illness

He turns to diagnosis. The reason he cannot become anything — not spiteful, not kind, not even an insect — is that he is too conscious. Being too conscious, he says, is a real disease, full-blown; ordinary human awareness would have been enough for an ordinary human life. Past a certain pitch, he argues, every impulse arrives accompanied by its analysis and every feeling by its counter-feeling; and at the moments when he is most capable of registering the sublime and the beautiful he is also doing the things he is most ashamed of. The two are linked. The chapter is the philosophical seed of the rest of Part 1.

Part 1, Ch. 3

The direct man and the wall

He compares the two types. The "direct" man, the man of action, the man who knows how to take revenge — when wronged, this man simply charges his target like an enraged bull, and only a wall stops him. (Direct men, encountering a wall, are stumped by it; for them a wall is something close to a moral fact.) The Underground Man envies him to the last drop of his bile. He cannot be him. He is the man of acute consciousness for whom revenge becomes the wish for revenge plus the suspicion that the wish is petty, by which time the moment has passed.

Part 1, Ch. 4

The pleasure of toothache

An imagined interlocutor laughs: next he will be finding enjoyment in toothache. He answers seriously — yes, even in toothache there is enjoyment. The sufferer's moans, he says, are not candid moans; they are malignant ones. They carry the pointlessness of the pain, the bitter awareness that nature does not care, the wish to hurt the family in the next room with the sound. The whole point is the malignancy. The chapter is a small case study of his larger argument: the man of acute consciousness can extract a kind of pleasure even from suffering, by performing the suffering for an audience he simultaneously despises.

Part 1, Ch. 5

Pleasure in degradation

One long paragraph. He asks whether a man who finds enjoyment in his own degradation can have a spark of self-respect — and answers, with some heat, that he can. The Underground Man has, he says, repeatedly enjoyed degrading himself. As a child he could never bring himself to ask for forgiveness — not because he could not say the words, but because he could say them too convincingly, and the convincing performance would have been another degradation. He used to get into trouble in cases where he had not actually done anything wrong, just for the texture of feeling guilty.

Part 1, Ch. 6

If only I had been lazy

A short, half-comic chapter. The Underground Man wishes he could have done nothing simply out of laziness. If he had — if "sluggard" had become his defining quality — he could at least have said one positive thing about himself. "Sluggard" would be a calling; he would have a label, a definition, a place. He could have grown a comfortable belly and a treble chin and a ruby nose and walked the streets being pointed to as Here is an asset, here is something real and solid. He cannot manage even this. He is not even a sluggard.

Part 1, Ch. 7

Rational interest

He turns to the polemic. Who first proclaimed, he asks, that man does nasty things only because he doesn't know his own interests? That if his eyes were opened to his real, normal interests, he would at once stop doing nasty things and become good and noble? It is, in the Russia of 1864, the most fashionable belief in the country. The Underground Man takes it apart. Man, he insists, will sometimes choose to act against his interest precisely to demonstrate that he is the kind of being who can. He will choose suffering. He will smash the calculations because the calculations make him predictable.

Part 1, Ch. 8

The piano key

He pushes the argument further. The imagined interlocutor objects: science is on the verge of demonstrating that what we call free will is nothing but a side effect of physical laws. The Underground Man concedes the point and refuses its implications. If science ever fully reduces the will to a formula — if every desire and every caprice can be predicted from antecedent causes — then man, in his own retaliation, will go mad on purpose. He will smash up the world to demonstrate that he is not a piano key. The reduction will not produce the predicted human; it will produce the man who will pay any cost to escape the reduction.

Part 1, Ch. 9

The anthill

Gentlemen, I'm joking — and I mean it. He concedes the joking and presses the argument. The ant has built the anthill, perfected it, completed the project; that is why ants are still ants. Man, mercifully, prefers the process of building to the building finished. The chess player, he says, loves the playing of the game, not the end of it. Perhaps the only goal on earth toward which mankind is striving is the incessant process of striving — that is, life itself, and not the goal. Once the goal is reached, two times two is four, the calculation is complete, and the man inside the calculation is dead.

Part 1, Ch. 10

The Crystal Palace

He arrives at the image the polemic has been pointing toward. You believe in a Crystal Palace, he tells the reader — a building that can never be destroyed, at which one will not be able to put one's tongue out or make a long nose on the sly. That, he says, is precisely why he is afraid of it. If it were a hen-house he could creep into it to keep out of the rain without pretending it was a palace. The crystal palace insists on its own perfection. Insisting on perfection forecloses the ordinary human freedom to disrespect what one has been given.

Part 1, Ch. 11

Long live underground

Part 1 closes on a self-cancelling triumph. Better to do nothing, the Underground Man cries; better conscious inertia; long live underground! Then, in the same chapter, the second move: I am lying. I do not believe a single word of what I have just written. I do believe it, perhaps, but at the same time I feel and suspect I am lying like a cobbler. The chapter ends Part 1 by demonstrating, in its own structure, the disease it has spent ten chapters describing. Even the conclusion has to be unmade.

Part 2, Ch. 1

Twenty-four years old

Part 2 begins. The narrator is now sixteen years younger — twenty-four, working at the same kind of office, living the same kind of solitary life in a smaller version of the same flat. He hates his coworkers and is afraid of them. He alternates between despising them and thinking they are superior to him. He has begun the long habit of dreaming — long elaborate fantasies of glory and noble action — that he will retreat into for years between bouts of contact with reality. The chapter is the prologue to the dinner.

Part 2, Ch. 2

The officer on the Nevsky

He recounts a small humiliation that grew into a two-year campaign. One night in a billiard room a tall officer in uniform brushed him aside without registering that anyone had been there. The Underground Man went home shaking. He spent the next two years plotting retaliation — borrowing money for a respectable overcoat with a beaver collar, learning the officer's habits, finally engineering a head-on collision on the Nevsky in which he refused to step aside. The officer did not notice the collision either. The two years took place entirely inside his head.

Part 2, Ch. 3

Simonov's flat

Bored, the Underground Man drops in unannounced on Simonov, an acquaintance from school. He finds two more old classmates already there — Ferfichkin and Trudolyubov — planning a farewell dinner the next day for Zverkov, who is being posted to the Caucasus. Zverkov was, all through school, the boy the Underground Man hated most precisely because the boy never noticed he existed. The Underground Man hears the plan and, to his own surprise and to everyone else's irritation, asks to come. The others assent grudgingly. He has booked himself a humiliation.

Part 2, Ch. 4

The dinner

He arrives at the tavern an hour early because he has misread the time. The others appear at six, surprised to see him already there. They are friendly to Zverkov and indifferent to him. He drinks too much. He delivers a sneering speech that nobody answers. He challenges Ferfichkin to a duel. He paces around the table while the others ignore him and resume their conversation. Eventually they finish dinner and decide to go on to a brothel. He has no money. He borrows six roubles from Simonov and follows them out into the wet snow.

Part 2, Ch. 5

Into the wet snow

He runs out of the tavern after them. "So this is it, this is it at last — contact with real life!" he shouts at himself, half-mocking, half in earnest. The wet snow is falling. He is drunk; he is humiliated; he is going to do something — he is not sure what. He flags a sledge; the driver demands six roubles; he hands him the money he has just borrowed from Simonov. Now everything is lost. He rides through the snow toward a brothel he is not entirely sure how to find.

Part 2, Ch. 6

The speech in the brothel

He goes upstairs with Liza. He sleeps. He wakes in the dark to a clock wheezing somewhere; it strikes two. She is lying beside him, awake. He begins to talk. The speech he gives over the next hour — long, intricate, half borrowed from sentimental novels and half horribly sincere — is about the life she is in, the family she has lost, the future ahead of her if she stays. He describes, with cruel specificity, the way she will end. She listens. She believes him. As he leaves, she gives him her address on a scrap of paper.

Part 2, Ch. 7

The address in his pocket

He walks home in the wet snow with the address in his pocket. By morning the speech of the night before has stopped feeling sincere and started feeling like a trap. He has invited Liza into his actual rooms, his actual servant, his actual coat, his actual money problems. The chapter is short and almost entirely interior: the Underground Man, in his flat, replaying the speech and inventing reasons why she will not come and reasons to wish she would not. He spends three days unable to decide.

Part 2, Ch. 8

The war with Apollon

The war with Apollon over a few rubles in unpaid wages has been running for weeks; it reaches its peak the morning Liza arrives. The Underground Man, in his dressing gown, screams at his elderly servant in the parlour while Apollon, immobile and contemptuous, refuses to be hurried. He borrows fifteen roubles from Anton Antonovitch to repay Simonov; he reports — falsely, complacently — that the dinner went well. He returns to the flat. The shouting at Apollon resumes. The bell rings. Liza is on the stair.

Part 2, Ch. 9

The cruelty

She comes in. The contrast between the man she has come to see and the man she has caught at the door is total. He turns on her. The speech of the brothel, he tells her, was a lie. He had been amusing himself with her tears. He had wanted to humiliate her precisely because she had let herself be moved. He keeps at it for several pages. Liza, instead of running, sees through it. She understands he is humiliated and frightened. She crosses the room and embraces him. He cannot bear it. He sleeps with her — to corrupt the moment, to convert what she has done into something he can dominate.

Part 2, Ch. 10

The five-rouble note

As she walks to the door he runs after her, opens her hand, presses a crumpled five-rouble note into it, and runs back across the room. He admits, narrating it, that he did this from spite — to convert her gift of love into a transaction so that he could survive what she had done. She walks out. On the table when he turns back is the note: she has thrown it down on her way past. He flies into the street. The snow is falling heavily. He runs to the crossroads. He stops. He never sees her again.

Key themes

5 threads that hold the book together. Full analysis →

Against the rational utopia

The first half of the novel is a sustained attack on the idea that human beings, once shown their interest, will follow it. The Underground Man insists they will not. He would rather smash the palace than live in it.

Hyperconsciousness as illness

The Underground Man insists that consciousness is a disease. Past a certain degree of self-awareness, every impulse arrives accompanied by its analysis, every feeling by its counter-feeling, and action becomes impossible.

Spite as a category of will

The Underground Man's defining act is to choose against his own interest on purpose. He refuses the doctor out of spite. He keeps writing out of spite. Spite, in the novel, is the form free will takes when nothing else is available.

The encounter with Liza

A young prostitute named Liza takes a sentimental speech of his seriously and arrives at his flat the next afternoon believing she could leave the life she is in. He turns on her with the cruelty of Part 1 made action. The book stops being a polemic.

The underground as condition

The basement flat is a real flat in Petersburg. The "underground" is something else — the condition of the man who has retreated from real life so completely that any contact with it now oppresses him. The novel ends with him still inside it.

Key figures

The 6 who matter most. More in the full character guide.

The Underground Man
The narrator

Forty years old, retired from a minor government clerkship on a small inheritance, living alone in a damp basement flat in Petersburg. Brilliant, bilious, hyperconscious, and unable to convert any of it into a life. Addresses the reader directly through Part 1 as both confession and polemic; recounts in Part 2 the three episodes from his twenties — the officer, the dinner, Liza — that brought him to where he is now. Unnamed throughout. Dostoevsky's most sustained portrait of a mind permanently at war with itself.

Liza
The encounter

A twenty-year-old who has recently arrived in Petersburg and works at the brothel where the Underground Man, drunk after the Zverkov dinner, ends up. He delivers a sentimental speech about the life she could still leave. She believes him. She comes to his flat three days later. He turns on her with the cruelty of Part 1 made action; she sees through him; she embraces him; he humiliates her again and presses a five-rouble note into her hand as she leaves. She throws the note onto the table and walks out into the snow. Liza is the only person in the book who does something the Underground Man cannot.

Zverkov
The schoolmate

An officer and former schoolmate, healthy, confident, socially competent in every register the Underground Man is not. About to be posted to a distant province. The Underground Man, hearing of the farewell dinner, forces his way into it, gets drunk, picks a fight, paces around the table, and follows the party afterwards to the brothel. Zverkov is barely a character in his own right; he is the Underground Man's mirror — what an ordinary man looks like, seen by a man who cannot be one.

Simonov
The organizer

Another former schoolmate, the one who organises the dinner for Zverkov. Not malicious — simply indifferent to the Underground Man, which the Underground Man finds harder to bear than malice would be. The Underground Man owes Simonov a small sum and borrows more from him to attend the dinner. Simonov lends it without comment. He is the novel's representative of ordinary social life, functional and unselfconscious, and therefore alien.

Apollon
The servant

The Underground Man's elderly manservant. Sullen, dignified, impossible to hurry, contemptuous of his employer in a register the Underground Man cannot break. Their long-running war over a few rubles in unpaid wages is the novel's running dark comedy and the trigger for the catastrophe with Liza — she walks in on him screaming at Apollon. Apollon is the one figure in the book the Underground Man is definitively unable to intimidate.

The Crystal Palace
The target

Not a character but a vision. Chernyshevsky's 1863 utopian novel What Is to Be Done? had popularised an image of a future society organised by rational self-interest, borrowed in part from the iron-and-glass exhibition hall built in London in 1851. Part 1 of Notes from Underground is a sustained assault on that vision. The question the novel raises is whether the Underground Man wins the argument or merely escapes from it.

Go deeper

Open Notes from Underground in the reader →