On the Genealogy of Morals — chapter by chapter

All 4 chapters — preface, then three essays that dismantle the foundations of European morality.

The Genealogy opens with a dense preface in which Nietzsche explains how he came to the problem and hands the reader a method: history, philology, psychology, suspicion. Essay 1 reconstructs the slave revolt in morality. Essay 2 genealogizes guilt and the bad conscience. Essay 3 — the longest — asks what ascetic ideals mean for the artist, the philosopher, the priest, and modern humanity. Each essay is self-contained; all three are one assault on the unexamined inheritance of European morality.

Preface

Method, history, and the problem that has followed Nietzsche since boyhood.

Preface

Preface

Nietzsche explains how the problem of the origin of moral values has followed him since boyhood, rejects the English moral historians' methods, and hands the reader a method of his own: history, philology, psychology, suspicion.

Appears: The philosopher of the future

Essay 1

The slave revolt — how "good and bad" became "good and evil."

Essay 1

First Essay — "Good and Evil," "Good and Bad"

The central argument of the book: "good" once meant noble and self-affirming; the slave revolt inverted the table, making the strong "evil" and the suffering "good." Nietzsche traces the etymology, names the carriers — Jewish prophecy, Christianity — and asks whether Judaea has permanently defeated Rome.

Appears: The noble / master type · The slave / herd · The priestly type

Essay 2

Guilt as debt — the bad conscience as cruelty turned inward.

Essay 2

Second Essay — "Guilt," "Bad Conscience," and the Like

Guilt is not a moral given — it is a debt. Nietzsche traces conscience back through archaic punishment to the creditor-debtor relation, then traces the bad conscience back to the enclosure of the human animal in society: cruelty with nowhere to go turns inward.

Appears: The slave / herd · The priestly type · Spinoza · The philosopher of the future

Essay 3

The ascetic ideal — what it means to will nothingness rather than not will at all.

Essay 3

Third Essay — What is the Meaning of Ascetic Ideals?

The longest and strangest essay. Nietzsche asks what ascetic ideals mean for every human type — artist, philosopher, priest, scientist — and answers: a will turned against itself. He closes by admitting that the ascetic ideal still has no rival, not even in science, and that man would rather will nothingness than not will at all.

Appears: The ascetic priest · The priestly type · Schopenhauer · The philosopher of the future

Start reading →